shareholder proposal / litigation · 2019

Hal S. Scott (Harvard Law professor, individual shareholder) and the Doris Behr 2012 Irrevocable Trust at Johnson & Johnson

Adopt a bylaw requiring shareholders to arbitrate securities-fraud claims against the company rather than sue in court, with a five-year sunset.

☆ Follow

What happened

Result: Excluded. Johnson & Johnson sought and received SEC no-action relief, resting on a New Jersey Attorney General opinion that the bylaw would violate state law, and left the proposal out of its 2019 proxy statement, which carried only two shareholder proposals, on clawback disclosure and on executive compensation and drug pricing risks. The proponents' federal suit was then dismissed in its entirety on June 30, 2021.

we found no documented change: Johnson & Johnson never adopted the mandatory-arbitration bylaw, and the court ruling preserved shareholders' existing right to sue in court.

Mandatory Arbitration Shareholder Proposal Goes to Court, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance

Who is involved

  • Hal S. Scott (Harvard Law professor, individual shareholder) and the Doris Behr 2012 Irrevocable Trust filer, not an organization we hold yet
  • Johnson & Johnson company

What this campaign is about

HAL S. SCOTT (HARVARD LAW PROFESSOR, INDIVIDUAL SHAREHOLDER) AND THE DORIS BEHR 2012 IRREVOCABLE TRUST AT JOHNSON & JOHNSON | ShareholderDemocracy