UN Sustainable Development GoalsBeta

Target 10.7: Orderly, safe migration

Facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people, including through the implementation of planned and well-managed migration policies

Helpful Owners voting their values help. Others must carry most of it.

☆ Follow

Why shareholder democracy is helpful

Migration policy is governmental, but two documented corporate levers exist. The first is publicly traded detention contractors. CREW found that CoreCivic, GEO Group and their PACs, subsidiaries and CEOs gave 2,779,000 dollars to Trump's 2024 election and inaugural funds. The 2025 budget law then allocated 45 billion dollars for ICE detention contracting. An ICCR-led proposal for a human-rights implementation report won 88 percent support at GEO Group's 2019 meeting. The second is employers and recruiters. The Global Compact's Progress Declaration assigns the private sector a role in fair recruitment and in reducing or banning worker-paid recruitment fees, as IHRB describes. These levers are marginal relative to state policy, so owners help at the margin.

How this was scoredHelpful

Helpful. Owners voting their values help. Others must carry most of it.

We have not yet written down the two answers behind this rating. Recording them on every item, so a reader can check the reasoning and not only the conclusion, is work in progress.

Every rating is the higher of two answers, one for what companies do and one for what they spend to stop the outcome, because the same vote reaches both. See the full method.

Sources

What civil society organizations are helping owners on this

Coordinated member resolutions at six companies exposed to immigration enforcement contracting, covering detention conditions, facial recognition sales to immigration authorities and financing of private prison operators.

USA: Investors file resolutions with companies at risk for human rights violations due to govt. contracts related to immigration, Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, 2019

4 campaigns on record

Members of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility at SunTrust Banks, Inc.☆ Follow2019 · shareholder proposal

Address the bank's funding of contractors implementing the zero tolerance immigration policy.

Result: not stated in source

SunTrust halted private prison financing in July 2019.

USA: Investors file resolutions with companies at risk for human rights violations due to govt. contracts related to immigration, Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, 2019

Members of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility at CoreCivic, Inc.☆ Follow2019 · shareholder proposal

Address allegations of forced labour and inadequate medical care in the company's detention facilities.

Result: not stated in source

USA: Investors file resolutions with companies at risk for human rights violations due to govt. contracts related to immigration, Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, 2019

USA West Province of the Society of Jesus at The GEO Group, Inc.☆ Follow2019 · shareholder resolution

Report annually on the company's website, beginning in September 2019, on how it implements the Respect for Our Inmates and Detainees part of its human rights policy: how employees are made aware of and apply the commitment to inmate and detainee human rights, the metrics used to assess human rights performance and any process for independent outside verification of them, and how shortcomings in human rights performance are remedied.

With Corporation of the Roman Catholic Clergymen, Dominican Sisters of Hope, Congregation of St. Joseph, US Central and Southern Province, Society of Jesus, USA Midwest Province of Society of Jesus, Creighton University, Province of Saint Joseph of the Capuchin Order, Sisters of Providence, Mother Joseph Province, Service Employees International Union Pension Plans Master Trust

Result: Approved at the May 7, 2019 annual meeting: 89,129,403 for, 12,271,605 against, 2,054,540 abstentions and 8,631,698 broker non-votes, which is 87.9 percent of the votes cast for and against. ICCR and the filers reported it as 88 percent support. GEO had asked the SEC for permission to leave the proposal out of its proxy on four grounds, Rule 14a-8(i)(2), (i)(3), (i)(6) and (i)(7), and the staff declined to concur on any of them, finding that the proposal transcends ordinary business matters.

GEO published its first implementation report, Respect for Our Inmates and Detainees, in September 2019. In a letter made public on 18 November 2019 the filers said the report falls far short of expectations and fails to meet current standards for human rights policies and processes. In February 2026 Reuters reported that Jesuit-led investors said GEO had rejected a further shareholder vote on its human rights conduct, ended talks on facility visits and reduced its human rights reporting.

The GEO Group, Inc.; Rule 14a-8 no-action letter (USA West Province of the Society of Jesus and others), U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Division of Corporation Finance, 2019-03-15

Members of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility at Wells Fargo☆ Follow2019 · shareholder proposal

Address the human rights risk in the bank's credit and bond underwriting for private prison and detention operators.

Result: not stated in source

Wells Fargo ended its relationships with GEO Group and CoreCivic in March 2019, and SunTrust halted private prison financing in July 2019.

USA: Investors file resolutions with companies at risk for human rights violations due to govt. contracts related to immigration, Business and Human Rights Resource Centre, 2019

Related subjects on other maps

Common Ground

Explore more goals the world has agreed on

UN Sustainable Development Goals, every item scored for how far it depends on owners voting their values, with the reasoning and the sources behind each rating.

Open the map

How this rating was made

Every item on every one of our maps is read against one question: how far does this depend on the people who own companies voting their values? We answer it twice, once for what companies do and once for what they spend to stop the outcome, and take whichever answer is higher, since the same vote reaches both. The score carries its reasoning and its sources so that a reader can check it rather than take it.

  • Pivotal. Owners voting their values can deliver most of the outcome.
  • Necessary. Owners remove an obstacle nothing else removes, and others must also act.
  • Helpful. Owners voting their values help, and others carry most of it.
  • Independent. This moves without owners. Other levers carry it.

The advocacy record on this page holds only what a source we opened says happened. Where we searched and found nothing, the page says so rather than leaving a silence. Where a campaign names a filer the source does not name, it says that too. Ratings are ours; the list of subjects is UN Sustainable Development Goals's, and we link to their original.

How we score dependency, in full.